<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>THE BRITISH CITIZEN &#187; parliament</title>
	<atom:link href="http://thebritishcitizen.com/category/government/parliament-government/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://thebritishcitizen.com</link>
	<description>&#38; London Watchman</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 17 May 2012 08:48:43 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>London MUST have more homes.  Now.</title>
		<link>http://thebritishcitizen.com/2012/03/london-must-have-more-homws-now/</link>
		<comments>http://thebritishcitizen.com/2012/03/london-must-have-more-homws-now/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 Mar 2012 15:57:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>London Watchman</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Democracy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Government]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Housing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[parliament]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[society]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[homeless]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[homes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[housing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[human rights]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[London]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thebritishcitizen.com/?p=2199</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&#160; The next Mayor must create Homes for London. We thought we had left the &#8216;Cathy Come Home&#8217; era of housing hardship back in the 1960s, but here we are again.   Poor government. Morally bankrupt politics and politicians. A selfish society we allowed to flourish. Click on the image to see video. Support the Homes<p><a class="more-link" href="http://thebritishcitizen.com/2012/03/london-must-have-more-homws-now/">Read more</a></p>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<!-- Start Shareaholic LikeButtonSetTop Automatic --><!-- End Shareaholic LikeButtonSetTop Automatic --><p><a title="Homes For London" href="http://thebritishcitizen.com/2012/03/london-must-have-more-homws-now/"><iframe src="http://www.youtube.com/embed/nuJlGzs6x24" frameborder="0" width="480" height="270"></iframe></a></p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<h2>The next Mayor must create Homes for London.</h2>
<p>We thought we had left the &#8216;Cathy Come Home&#8217; era of housing hardship back in the 1960s, but here we are again.   Poor government. Morally bankrupt politics and politicians. A selfish society we allowed to flourish.</p>
<p>Click on the image to see video.</p>
<p>Support the Homes For London Campaign <a title="Homes For London" href="http://homesforlondon.org.uk/" target="_blank">here</a>.</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<div class="shr-publisher-2199"></div><!-- Start Shareaholic LikeButtonSetBottom Automatic --><div style="clear: both; min-height: 1px; height: 3px; width: 100%;"></div><div class='shareaholic-like-buttonset' style='float:none;height:30px;'><a class='shareaholic-tweetbutton' data-shr_count='horizontal' data-shr_href='http%3A%2F%2Fthebritishcitizen.com%2F2012%2F03%2Flondon-must-have-more-homws-now%2F' data-shr_title='London+MUST+have+more+homes.++Now.'></a><a class='shareaholic-fblike' data-shr_layout='button_count' data-shr_showfaces='false' data-shr_href='http%3A%2F%2Fthebritishcitizen.com%2F2012%2F03%2Flondon-must-have-more-homws-now%2F' data-shr_title='London+MUST+have+more+homes.++Now.'></a><a class='shareaholic-fbsend' data-shr_href='http%3A%2F%2Fthebritishcitizen.com%2F2012%2F03%2Flondon-must-have-more-homws-now%2F'></a><a class='shareaholic-googleplusone' data-shr_size='medium' data-shr_count='true' data-shr_href='http%3A%2F%2Fthebritishcitizen.com%2F2012%2F03%2Flondon-must-have-more-homws-now%2F' data-shr_title='London+MUST+have+more+homes.++Now.'></a></div><div style="clear: both; min-height: 1px; height: 3px; width: 100%;"></div><!-- End Shareaholic LikeButtonSetBottom Automatic -->]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://thebritishcitizen.com/2012/03/london-must-have-more-homws-now/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Borders? What borders?  Witless Tories just let everyone in.</title>
		<link>http://thebritishcitizen.com/2011/11/no-borders-ukba/</link>
		<comments>http://thebritishcitizen.com/2011/11/no-borders-ukba/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 Nov 2011 20:11:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>The Citizen</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Civil Service]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Coalition]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[crime]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Democracy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Government]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[immigration]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[jobs / employment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[multiculturalism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[national security]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[parliament]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[terrorism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[UKBA]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thebritishcitizen.com/?p=1958</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Who&#8217;da thought it?   The Nasty Party have let their pants fall down to reveal&#8230; nothing! No immigration policy, no controls, no borders &#8211; and not a clue. Home Secretary Teresa &#8216;Kitten Heels&#8217; May hasn&#8217;t even been to see if the UK Border Force is fit for purpose at our ports and airports. Clearly, it isn&#8217;t<p><a class="more-link" href="http://thebritishcitizen.com/2011/11/no-borders-ukba/">Read more</a></p>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<!-- Start Shareaholic LikeButtonSetTop Automatic --><!-- End Shareaholic LikeButtonSetTop Automatic --><p>Who&#8217;da thought it?   The Nasty Party have let their pants fall down to reveal&#8230; <em>nothing!</em></p>
<p><strong>No immigration policy, no controls, no borders &#8211; and not a clue.</strong></p>
<p>Home Secretary Teresa &#8216;Kitten Heels&#8217; May hasn&#8217;t even been to see if the UK Border Force is fit for purpose at our ports and airports. Clearly, it isn&#8217;t up to doing the job.  But why?  It&#8217;s not the fault of the hard-working staff themselves.</p>
<p><strong>IT&#8217;S SIMPLY BECAUSE WE DON&#8217;T HAVE <span style="text-decoration: underline;">ENOUGH</span> OF THEM.</strong></p>
<p><strong>It doesn&#8217;t take a genius to work out the solution.</strong><br />
First, take the number of incoming travellers arriving per day (a), then work out how many passengers a Passport Control Officer can process each d<a href="http://thebritishcitizen.com/2011/11/no-borders-ukba/borderforce1/" rel="attachment wp-att-1959"><img class="alignleft size-medium wp-image-1959" style="margin: 10px;" title="borderforce1" src="http://thebritishcitizen.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/11/borderforce1-300x183.jpg" alt="borderforce1 300x183 Borders? What borders?  Witless Tories just let everyone in." width="300" height="183" /></a>ay (b), then divide (b) into (a).<br />
Then you make sure you employ the right number of people to get the job done promptly and efficiently.  How difficult is that?!</p>
<p><strong>Compared to the financial and social disaster of allowing thousands of terrorists, thieves, fraudsters, benefit cheats and their families into the country, the cost of hiring some extra UKBA staff is <em>nothing</em>.</strong></p>
<p>We hear Cameron and the Tories bang on about Civil Service and state sector inefficiency, or blame everything on <em>&#8216;the mess Labour left us with&#8217;</em>, and yet they couldn&#8217;t organise a proverbial p**s-up in a brewery.  How long will it take before some Tory-led &#8216;committee&#8217; decides to throw billions of taxpayer money at hiring a <em>private contractor</em> to do the job?  And will the owner of that contractor be a Tory donor?<br />
Take a good guess.</p>
<p>People voted these idiots into power to play party politics with OUR money.  Are we nuts? Is any politician actually going to <strong>DO</strong> anything about this mess instead of making the typical empty promises?</p>
<p><strong>For Pete&#8217;s sake, complain to your MP and force the government&#8217;s hand.   The LibDumbs won&#8217;t do it, because they&#8217;ll let literally EVERYONE in.</strong></p>
<p>If we don&#8217;t stop this nonsense now, we&#8217;ll never be able to stop the tide of criminals, terrorists, cheats and scroungers flooding into the country we love.</p>
<div class="shr-publisher-1958"></div><!-- Start Shareaholic LikeButtonSetBottom Automatic --><div style="clear: both; min-height: 1px; height: 3px; width: 100%;"></div><div class='shareaholic-like-buttonset' style='float:none;height:30px;'><a class='shareaholic-tweetbutton' data-shr_count='horizontal' data-shr_href='http%3A%2F%2Fthebritishcitizen.com%2F2011%2F11%2Fno-borders-ukba%2F' data-shr_title='Borders%3F+What+borders%3F++Witless+Tories+just+let+everyone+in.'></a><a class='shareaholic-fblike' data-shr_layout='button_count' data-shr_showfaces='false' data-shr_href='http%3A%2F%2Fthebritishcitizen.com%2F2011%2F11%2Fno-borders-ukba%2F' data-shr_title='Borders%3F+What+borders%3F++Witless+Tories+just+let+everyone+in.'></a><a class='shareaholic-fbsend' data-shr_href='http%3A%2F%2Fthebritishcitizen.com%2F2011%2F11%2Fno-borders-ukba%2F'></a><a class='shareaholic-googleplusone' data-shr_size='medium' data-shr_count='true' data-shr_href='http%3A%2F%2Fthebritishcitizen.com%2F2011%2F11%2Fno-borders-ukba%2F' data-shr_title='Borders%3F+What+borders%3F++Witless+Tories+just+let+everyone+in.'></a></div><div style="clear: both; min-height: 1px; height: 3px; width: 100%;"></div><!-- End Shareaholic LikeButtonSetBottom Automatic -->]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://thebritishcitizen.com/2011/11/no-borders-ukba/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Tories privatise the nation, as planned.  British people take the hit.</title>
		<link>http://thebritishcitizen.com/2011/05/thatcher-again/</link>
		<comments>http://thebritishcitizen.com/2011/05/thatcher-again/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 May 2011 14:28:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>The Citizen</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[banks and bankers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Coalition]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Democracy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[economy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Government]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[jobs / employment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NHS]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[parliament]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[recession]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[society]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[unemployment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[workers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[citizen]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cuts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[jobs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[protest]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tories]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thebritishcitizen.com/?p=1652</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The effects of Tories privatising Britain are starting to hit home, and it&#8217;s the people who take the hit, not the rich or the bankers who created the problems. Well, what did people expect when they voted Tory last year?  Were they taken in by the nice green tree in their new logo?  No more<p><a class="more-link" href="http://thebritishcitizen.com/2011/05/thatcher-again/">Read more</a></p>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<!-- Start Shareaholic LikeButtonSetTop Automatic --><!-- End Shareaholic LikeButtonSetTop Automatic --><p><strong><a href="http://thebritishcitizen.com/2011/05/thatcher-again/likethatcher-worse-med/" rel="attachment wp-att-1955"><img class="alignleft size-full wp-image-1955" style="margin: 10px;" title="likethatcher-worse-med" src="http://thebritishcitizen.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/05/likethatcher-worse-med.jpg" alt="likethatcher worse med Tories privatise the nation, as planned.  British people take the hit." width="240" height="360" /></a>The effects of Tories privatising Britain are starting to hit home, and it&#8217;s the people who take the hit, not the rich or the bankers who created the problems.<br />
</strong></p>
<p>Well, what did people expect when they voted Tory last year?  Were they taken in by the nice green tree in their new logo?  No more &#8216;nasty party&#8217;?  What a Con trick.</p>
<p>Under the Tories, ordinary people are treated like so much detritus:  human debris which is left behind after &#8216;market forces&#8217; are given free rein in society.</p>
<p><span style="text-decoration: underline;">Greatly reduced public services, awarding valuable public contracts to foreign companies, huge job losses&#8230; it feels like Thatcher all over again.</span></p>
<p><span style="color: #000080;"><em>&#8220;Services for older people, services for disabled people are suffering. There has been a dramatic cut to information, advice and guidance, which is something that at a time of economic hardship we need more of, not less.&#8221; </em></span><a title="ePolitix article" href="http://www.epolitix.com/latestnews/article-detail/newsarticle/deep-ideological-divide-between-government-and-unions/" target="_blank">(ePolitix.com)</a><em><br />
</em></p>
<p>As for the so-called &#8216;big society&#8217;, and the very people and organisations expected by the Tories to fill the gap left in our public services:</p>
<p><span style="color: #000080;"><em>&#8220;The capacity for the third sector to grow more volunteers is being reduced, as volunteer development budgets are being axed. This all combines to reduce the status of volunteering and to raise the question of what purpose the government intends the voluntary sector to serve.&#8221;</em> </span>  <a title="ePolitix article" href="http://www.epolitix.com/latestnews/article-detail/newsarticle/deep-ideological-divide-between-government-and-unions/" target="_blank">(ePolitix.com)</a></p>
<p><span id="more-1652"></span></p>
<p>So much for cynical Tory claims that &#8220;we&#8217;re all in this together&#8221;.</p>
<p>Thousands upon thousands of newly-unemployed people will be forced to claim benefits while they search &#8211; probably in vain &#8211; for another job.   New jobs  will be hard to find in the private sector, and unlikely to be at the same level of pay. Result?  Growing ranks of long-term unemployed, exploited by Tory-voting bosses offering low pay and lousy conditions.   A cynic might say that some are &#8220;in this together&#8221; rather more than others.</p>
<p>And who do we have to oppose the Tories now?   Certainly not the Lib Dumbs, who will do anything to cling onto a bit of limelight for themselves.  We had high hopes for the beloved Vince, but even he&#8217;s a busted flush these days.  <a href="http://thebritishcitizen.com/2011/05/thatcher-again/edmil/" rel="attachment wp-att-1975"><img class="alignright size-medium wp-image-1975" style="margin: 20px;" title="edmil" src="http://thebritishcitizen.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/05/edmil-300x226.jpg" alt="edmil 300x226 Tories privatise the nation, as planned.  British people take the hit." width="300" height="226" /></a></p>
<p>No opposition from <strong>Labour</strong>, either.   None of their front bench is up to much now that men like Blair, Prescott, Milburn and others have gone.  &#8220;Blair?!&#8221;, you cry?   Well, after we failed to recognise the strength and ability of people like David Owen in the 80s and 90s, we did eventually find someone to take on the Tory enemy.</p>
<p>We can debate Blair&#8217;s various achievements or otherwise, but he did turn out to be <strong>pretty good at stuffing the Tories</strong>.      Now that the wrong Milliband has been elected as party leader <em>(the gormless windbag pictured, right)</em> we can expect the barren years of Foot and Kinnock to come back and haunt us, probably for another 18 years.   Tory toffs Dave and George must think all their Christmases have come at once.</p>
<p>A lot of young voters won&#8217;t remember Thatcher or the huge social rift she created in our society during the 1980s:  the years which embedded a deep layer of uneducated, unemployable thugs that we all complain about now.   Enterprising thugs whose only way of engaging with the economics of our society is to get a bigger attack dog and terrorise people on the street.  Sure, the Tories made all the right noises about enterprise and giving people better opportunities (as they always do), but the reverse happens when you allow the profit motive to rule your social policies.</p>
<p>Factor in the still-smouldering global economic crisis &#8211; with defaults by Greece, Ireland, Portugal and more to follow &#8211; and we have some long, hard years in front of us.  Much harder than people are expecting.</p>
<p><strong>There are no lights at the end of the tunnel this time unless we stop the Tories in their slimy tracks.</strong></p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<div class="shr-publisher-1652"></div><!-- Start Shareaholic LikeButtonSetBottom Automatic --><div style="clear: both; min-height: 1px; height: 3px; width: 100%;"></div><div class='shareaholic-like-buttonset' style='float:none;height:30px;'><a class='shareaholic-tweetbutton' data-shr_count='horizontal' data-shr_href='http%3A%2F%2Fthebritishcitizen.com%2F2011%2F05%2Fthatcher-again%2F' data-shr_title='Tories+privatise+the+nation%2C+as+planned.++British+people+take+the+hit.'></a><a class='shareaholic-fblike' data-shr_layout='button_count' data-shr_showfaces='false' data-shr_href='http%3A%2F%2Fthebritishcitizen.com%2F2011%2F05%2Fthatcher-again%2F' data-shr_title='Tories+privatise+the+nation%2C+as+planned.++British+people+take+the+hit.'></a><a class='shareaholic-fbsend' data-shr_href='http%3A%2F%2Fthebritishcitizen.com%2F2011%2F05%2Fthatcher-again%2F'></a><a class='shareaholic-googleplusone' data-shr_size='medium' data-shr_count='true' data-shr_href='http%3A%2F%2Fthebritishcitizen.com%2F2011%2F05%2Fthatcher-again%2F' data-shr_title='Tories+privatise+the+nation%2C+as+planned.++British+people+take+the+hit.'></a></div><div style="clear: both; min-height: 1px; height: 3px; width: 100%;"></div><!-- End Shareaholic LikeButtonSetBottom Automatic -->]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://thebritishcitizen.com/2011/05/thatcher-again/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>If you’re not religious, say ‘NO’</title>
		<link>http://thebritishcitizen.com/2010/11/census-campaign/</link>
		<comments>http://thebritishcitizen.com/2010/11/census-campaign/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 15 Nov 2010 11:37:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>The Citizen</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Coalition]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Democracy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Government]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[parliament]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[society]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[reform]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[vote]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[voting]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thebritishcitizen.com/?p=1619</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The census data on religion produced by the 2001 census gave a wholly misleading picture of the religiosity of the UK, cutting the number of non-religious people in half. If you say you’re religious on the census and don’t really mean it, then you are treated by some sections of the media, churches, and even<p><a class="more-link" href="http://thebritishcitizen.com/2010/11/census-campaign/">Read more</a></p>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<!-- Start Shareaholic LikeButtonSetTop Automatic --><!-- End Shareaholic LikeButtonSetTop Automatic --><p><a rel="http://census-campaign.org.uk" href="http://census-campaign.org.uk/" target="_blank"><img class="alignright size-full wp-image-1620" style="margin: 10px 20px; border: 1px solid black;" title="Link to Census Campaign website" src="http://www.thebritishcitizen.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/11/humanistbanner.jpg" alt="humanistbanner If you’re not religious, say ‘NO’" width="360" height="126" /></a>The census data on religion produced by the 2001 census gave a wholly  misleading picture of the religiosity of the UK, cutting the number of  non-religious people in half.</p>
<p>If you say you’re religious on the census and don’t really mean it, then  you are treated by some sections of the media, churches, and even  government policymakers as if you are a fully-fledged believer.</p>
<p>The short answer is simple. If you’re not religious, then answer “No Religion” on the census.</p>
<p><a title="Census Campaign website" href="http://census-campaign.org.uk/what-is-happening/why-does-it-matter/" target="_blank">Why bad / inaccurate census data matters.</a></p>
<p>After the 2001 Census, the figures collected were used to justify the following policies:</p>
<ul>
<li><span style="color: #800080;"><strong>Increase in the number of faith schools</strong>, where you have to pretend to be religious to get your child in<br />
</span></li>
<li><span style="color: #800080;"><strong>The continuation of (biased) collective worship in schools</strong></span></li>
<li>The public funding and support of ‘interfaith’ and faith-based organisations above the support offered to secular organisations</li>
<li>Suggestions of an increase in the role of faith in Britain under the coalition government</li>
<li>The appointments of government advisors on faith</li>
<li>Contracting out public services to religious organisations</li>
<li><span style="color: #800080;"><strong>Keeping the 26 Bishops in the House of Lords as of right</strong></span></li>
<li><span style="color: #800080;"><strong>Continued high number of hours dedicated to religious broadcasting</strong></span></li>
<li>Specific consultation at government and local level with ‘faith communities’ over and above other groups within society</li>
<li><span style="color: #800080;"><strong>Continued privileges for religious groups in equality law and other legislation</strong></span></li>
</ul>
<p>The Census gives the official figures about various aspects of the  population. Data is used by government both locally and centrally as  evidence to back up their policy decisions. If the number of people who  appear to be religious is inflated, policies regarding service delivery,  equality work and many other areas will be affected.</p>
<p>If the 2011 census creates a similarly inaccurate figure, it may lead to  further discrimination against non-religious people and greater  privileging for religious groups and individuals.</p>
<h2><span style="color: #800080;">Don&#8217;t let it happen &#8211; if you&#8217;re not religious, say so.</span></h2>
<div class="shr-publisher-1619"></div><!-- Start Shareaholic LikeButtonSetBottom Automatic --><div style="clear: both; min-height: 1px; height: 3px; width: 100%;"></div><div class='shareaholic-like-buttonset' style='float:none;height:30px;'><a class='shareaholic-tweetbutton' data-shr_count='horizontal' data-shr_href='http%3A%2F%2Fthebritishcitizen.com%2F2010%2F11%2Fcensus-campaign%2F' data-shr_title='If+you%E2%80%99re+not+religious%2C+say+%E2%80%98NO%E2%80%99'></a><a class='shareaholic-fblike' data-shr_layout='button_count' data-shr_showfaces='false' data-shr_href='http%3A%2F%2Fthebritishcitizen.com%2F2010%2F11%2Fcensus-campaign%2F' data-shr_title='If+you%E2%80%99re+not+religious%2C+say+%E2%80%98NO%E2%80%99'></a><a class='shareaholic-fbsend' data-shr_href='http%3A%2F%2Fthebritishcitizen.com%2F2010%2F11%2Fcensus-campaign%2F'></a><a class='shareaholic-googleplusone' data-shr_size='medium' data-shr_count='true' data-shr_href='http%3A%2F%2Fthebritishcitizen.com%2F2010%2F11%2Fcensus-campaign%2F' data-shr_title='If+you%E2%80%99re+not+religious%2C+say+%E2%80%98NO%E2%80%99'></a></div><div style="clear: both; min-height: 1px; height: 3px; width: 100%;"></div><!-- End Shareaholic LikeButtonSetBottom Automatic -->]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://thebritishcitizen.com/2010/11/census-campaign/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Served from: thebritishcitizen.com @ 2012-05-21 06:27:22 -->
