<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title> &#187; society</title>
	<atom:link href="http://thebritishcitizen.com/category/society/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://thebritishcitizen.com</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 17 May 2012 08:48:43 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>MigrationWatch response to Times editorial</title>
		<link>http://thebritishcitizen.com/2012/05/2269/</link>
		<comments>http://thebritishcitizen.com/2012/05/2269/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 May 2012 13:24:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>The Citizen</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Government]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[immigration]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[jobs / employment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[multiculturalism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[society]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[unemployment]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thebritishcitizen.com/?p=2269</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Response to The Times Leader on Immigration (Reproduced from the MigrationWatch website) By Sir Andrew Green Chairman of Migration Watch UK 12 May 2012 Dear Sir, Your editorial “British Workers” (12 May) was right to point out that the flow of workers from EU states stems from treaty obligations and cannot be cut back by<p><a class="more-link" href="http://thebritishcitizen.com/2012/05/2269/">Read more</a></p>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<!-- Start Shareaholic LikeButtonSetTop Automatic --><!-- End Shareaholic LikeButtonSetTop Automatic --><p><a title="Link to Times editorial" href="http://news.migrationwatch.org.uk/2012/05/response-to-the-times-leader-on-immigration.html" target="_blank">Response to The Times Leader on Immigration</a></p>
<p>(Reproduced from the <a href="http://www.migrationwatch.org.uk" target="_blank">MigrationWatch</a> website)</p>
<h3>By Sir Andrew Green<br />
Chairman of Migration Watch UK</h3>
<p>12 May 2012</p>
<p>Dear Sir,</p>
<p><img class="alignleft size-full wp-image-2139" style="margin: 10px;" title="More immigrants trying to sneak in illegally" src="http://thebritishcitizen.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/03/asylumR2708_468x320.jpg" alt="asylumR2708 468x320 MigrationWatch response to Times editorial" width="468" height="320" />Your editorial “British Workers” (12 May) was right to point out that the flow of workers from EU states stems from treaty obligations and cannot be cut back by immigration policy. However, despite all the talk about Polish workers, it is important to understand that the EU is not where the real numbers are coming from.</p>
<p>For nearly ten years non EU immigration has been running at about 300,000 a year but only 100,000 have been leaving. This can and must be addressed by changes in the immigration regime. Net migration accounts for two thirds of the population growth that is placing such pressure on our public services at a time of financial stringency.</p>
<p>Yours sincerely,</p>
<div class="shr-publisher-2269"></div><!-- Start Shareaholic LikeButtonSetBottom Automatic --><div style="clear: both; min-height: 1px; height: 3px; width: 100%;"></div><div class='shareaholic-like-buttonset' style='float:none;height:30px;'><a class='shareaholic-tweetbutton' data-shr_count='horizontal' data-shr_href='http%3A%2F%2Fthebritishcitizen.com%2F2012%2F05%2F2269%2F' data-shr_title='MigrationWatch+response+to+Times+editorial'></a><a class='shareaholic-fblike' data-shr_layout='button_count' data-shr_showfaces='false' data-shr_href='http%3A%2F%2Fthebritishcitizen.com%2F2012%2F05%2F2269%2F' data-shr_title='MigrationWatch+response+to+Times+editorial'></a><a class='shareaholic-fbsend' data-shr_href='http%3A%2F%2Fthebritishcitizen.com%2F2012%2F05%2F2269%2F'></a><a class='shareaholic-googleplusone' data-shr_size='medium' data-shr_count='true' data-shr_href='http%3A%2F%2Fthebritishcitizen.com%2F2012%2F05%2F2269%2F' data-shr_title='MigrationWatch+response+to+Times+editorial'></a></div><div style="clear: both; min-height: 1px; height: 3px; width: 100%;"></div><!-- End Shareaholic LikeButtonSetBottom Automatic -->]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://thebritishcitizen.com/2012/05/2269/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>London council tries to ship homeless families North</title>
		<link>http://thebritishcitizen.com/2012/04/london-council-tries-to-ship-homeless-up-north/</link>
		<comments>http://thebritishcitizen.com/2012/04/london-council-tries-to-ship-homeless-up-north/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Apr 2012 09:07:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>London Watchman</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Government]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Housing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[society]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[homeless]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thebritishcitizen.com/?p=2211</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Had to happen sooner or later. Newham Council wants to export 500 of its homeless families to Stoke-on-Trent, due to the cost and lack of private rented homes. The rents in London are sky-high, the &#8216;government&#8217; isn&#8217;t building any social housing but they decide to cap housing benefit rates. It&#8217;s like taking the tourniquet off<p><a class="more-link" href="http://thebritishcitizen.com/2012/04/london-council-tries-to-ship-homeless-up-north/">Read more</a></p>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<!-- Start Shareaholic LikeButtonSetTop Automatic --><!-- End Shareaholic LikeButtonSetTop Automatic --><p><a href="http://www.independent.co.uk/news/uk/politics/london-council-slammed-over-social-cleansing-housing-move-7674939.html" rel="http://www.independent.co.uk/news/uk/politics/london-council-slammed-over-social-cleansing-housing-move-7674939.html" target="_blank"><img class="alignleft size-thumbnail wp-image-2213" style="margin: 10px;" title="Homeless famlies in London" src="http://thebritishcitizen.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/04/2p-150x150.jpg" alt="2p 150x150 London council tries to ship homeless families North" width="150" height="150" /></a>Had to happen sooner or later. <a href="http://www.independent.co.uk/news/uk/politics/london-council-slammed-over-social-cleansing-housing-move-7674939.html" target="_blank">Newham Council</a> wants to export 500 of its homeless families to Stoke-on-Trent, due to the cost and lack of private rented homes.</p>
<p>The rents in London are sky-high, the &#8216;government&#8217; isn&#8217;t building any social housing but they decide to cap housing benefit rates. It&#8217;s like taking the tourniquet off an open wound.</p>
<p>Still, what do the Tories care? They&#8217;re all in it together, but it seems that the rest of us may not be in it with them after all. In a decent home with a roof over our heads, that is.</p>
<p>Wonder how many private landlords vote Tory?</p>
<p>Another example of life in Britain under the Conservatives: the &#8216;arrogant posh boys&#8217; as they are described by one of their own MPs, Nadine Dorries, only today.</p>
<p>Are we stupid and gullible to put up with government like this, whether Tory, Labour or Lib Dumbs?</p>
<p><strong>It&#8217;s time for big changes in our country.</strong></p>
<div class="shr-publisher-2211"></div><!-- Start Shareaholic LikeButtonSetBottom Automatic --><div style="clear: both; min-height: 1px; height: 3px; width: 100%;"></div><div class='shareaholic-like-buttonset' style='float:none;height:30px;'><a class='shareaholic-tweetbutton' data-shr_count='horizontal' data-shr_href='http%3A%2F%2Fthebritishcitizen.com%2F2012%2F04%2Flondon-council-tries-to-ship-homeless-up-north%2F' data-shr_title='London+council+tries+to+ship+homeless+families+North'></a><a class='shareaholic-fblike' data-shr_layout='button_count' data-shr_showfaces='false' data-shr_href='http%3A%2F%2Fthebritishcitizen.com%2F2012%2F04%2Flondon-council-tries-to-ship-homeless-up-north%2F' data-shr_title='London+council+tries+to+ship+homeless+families+North'></a><a class='shareaholic-fbsend' data-shr_href='http%3A%2F%2Fthebritishcitizen.com%2F2012%2F04%2Flondon-council-tries-to-ship-homeless-up-north%2F'></a><a class='shareaholic-googleplusone' data-shr_size='medium' data-shr_count='true' data-shr_href='http%3A%2F%2Fthebritishcitizen.com%2F2012%2F04%2Flondon-council-tries-to-ship-homeless-up-north%2F' data-shr_title='London+council+tries+to+ship+homeless+families+North'></a></div><div style="clear: both; min-height: 1px; height: 3px; width: 100%;"></div><!-- End Shareaholic LikeButtonSetBottom Automatic -->]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://thebritishcitizen.com/2012/04/london-council-tries-to-ship-homeless-up-north/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>London MUST have more homes.  Now.</title>
		<link>http://thebritishcitizen.com/2012/03/london-must-have-more-homws-now/</link>
		<comments>http://thebritishcitizen.com/2012/03/london-must-have-more-homws-now/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 Mar 2012 15:57:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>London Watchman</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Democracy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Government]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Housing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[parliament]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[society]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[homeless]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[homes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[housing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[human rights]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[London]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thebritishcitizen.com/?p=2199</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&#160; The next Mayor must create Homes for London. We thought we had left the &#8216;Cathy Come Home&#8217; era of housing hardship back in the 1960s, but here we are again.   Poor government. Morally bankrupt politics and politicians. A selfish society we allowed to flourish. Click on the image to see video. Support the Homes<p><a class="more-link" href="http://thebritishcitizen.com/2012/03/london-must-have-more-homws-now/">Read more</a></p>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<!-- Start Shareaholic LikeButtonSetTop Automatic --><!-- End Shareaholic LikeButtonSetTop Automatic --><p><a title="Homes For London" href="http://thebritishcitizen.com/2012/03/london-must-have-more-homws-now/"><iframe src="http://www.youtube.com/embed/nuJlGzs6x24" frameborder="0" width="480" height="270"></iframe></a></p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<h2>The next Mayor must create Homes for London.</h2>
<p>We thought we had left the &#8216;Cathy Come Home&#8217; era of housing hardship back in the 1960s, but here we are again.   Poor government. Morally bankrupt politics and politicians. A selfish society we allowed to flourish.</p>
<p>Click on the image to see video.</p>
<p>Support the Homes For London Campaign <a title="Homes For London" href="http://homesforlondon.org.uk/" target="_blank">here</a>.</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<div class="shr-publisher-2199"></div><!-- Start Shareaholic LikeButtonSetBottom Automatic --><div style="clear: both; min-height: 1px; height: 3px; width: 100%;"></div><div class='shareaholic-like-buttonset' style='float:none;height:30px;'><a class='shareaholic-tweetbutton' data-shr_count='horizontal' data-shr_href='http%3A%2F%2Fthebritishcitizen.com%2F2012%2F03%2Flondon-must-have-more-homws-now%2F' data-shr_title='London+MUST+have+more+homes.++Now.'></a><a class='shareaholic-fblike' data-shr_layout='button_count' data-shr_showfaces='false' data-shr_href='http%3A%2F%2Fthebritishcitizen.com%2F2012%2F03%2Flondon-must-have-more-homws-now%2F' data-shr_title='London+MUST+have+more+homes.++Now.'></a><a class='shareaholic-fbsend' data-shr_href='http%3A%2F%2Fthebritishcitizen.com%2F2012%2F03%2Flondon-must-have-more-homws-now%2F'></a><a class='shareaholic-googleplusone' data-shr_size='medium' data-shr_count='true' data-shr_href='http%3A%2F%2Fthebritishcitizen.com%2F2012%2F03%2Flondon-must-have-more-homws-now%2F' data-shr_title='London+MUST+have+more+homes.++Now.'></a></div><div style="clear: both; min-height: 1px; height: 3px; width: 100%;"></div><!-- End Shareaholic LikeButtonSetBottom Automatic -->]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://thebritishcitizen.com/2012/03/london-must-have-more-homws-now/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>TWO HUNDRED more homes a day needed JUST for immigrants</title>
		<link>http://thebritishcitizen.com/2011/09/200-homes-for-immigrants/</link>
		<comments>http://thebritishcitizen.com/2011/09/200-homes-for-immigrants/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 22 Sep 2011 11:04:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>The Citizen</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Government]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Housing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[immigration]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[unemployment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[asylum-seekers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[housing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[immigrants]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[society]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thebritishcitizen.com/?p=1701</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[It&#8217;s official, but swept under the carpet: 36% of new households will be a result of immigration so we will have to build, on average, 200 homes a day for the next 25 years just to house the extra population arising from immigration. Even if house building were to increase by 25% over the current<p><a class="more-link" href="http://thebritishcitizen.com/2011/09/200-homes-for-immigrants/">Read more</a></p>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<!-- Start Shareaholic LikeButtonSetTop Automatic --><!-- End Shareaholic LikeButtonSetTop Automatic --><p><a href="http://thebritishcitizen.com/2011/09/200-homes-for-immigrants/housingbenefit/" rel="attachment wp-att-1768"><img class="alignleft size-medium wp-image-1768" style="margin: 10px;" title="housingbenefit" src="http://thebritishcitizen.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/09/housingbenefit-300x213.jpg" alt="housingbenefit 300x213 TWO HUNDRED more homes a day needed JUST for immigrants" width="300" height="213" /></a>It&#8217;s official, but swept under the carpet: 36% of new households will be a result of immigration so we will have to build, on average, <strong>200 homes a day for the next 25 years just to house the extra population arising from immigration.</strong></p>
<p>Even if house building were to increase by 25% over the current level to 200,000 a year, there would be a shortage of around 800,000 homes by 2033 &#8211; equivalent to the number of homes in Leeds, Manchester, Newcastle and Nottingham combined.</p>
<p>Commenting, Sir Andrew Green, Chairman of Migrationwatch UK, said:</p>
<p><em>&#8220;As we saw earlier this week political correctness has dictated that the construction and planning industry should not refer to the massive impact of immigration on housing. It is not, of course, the only factor in household formation but it is a major factor accounting for 36% of new households over the next 25 years. It is also one of the few factors that the government ought to be able to control.  It is high time that we faced up to the huge impact of immigration on housing and to the severe consequences for our environment of continued mass immigration&#8221;</em>.</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p>Check out the report by clicking <a title="Migrationwatch report" href="http://news.migrationwatch.org.uk/2011/08/immigration-is-a-major-factor-in-the-housing-shortage.html" target="_blank">here</a>.</p>
<div class="shr-publisher-1701"></div><!-- Start Shareaholic LikeButtonSetBottom Automatic --><div style="clear: both; min-height: 1px; height: 3px; width: 100%;"></div><div class='shareaholic-like-buttonset' style='float:none;height:30px;'><a class='shareaholic-tweetbutton' data-shr_count='horizontal' data-shr_href='http%3A%2F%2Fthebritishcitizen.com%2F2011%2F09%2F200-homes-for-immigrants%2F' data-shr_title='TWO+HUNDRED+more+homes+a+day+needed+JUST+for+immigrants'></a><a class='shareaholic-fblike' data-shr_layout='button_count' data-shr_showfaces='false' data-shr_href='http%3A%2F%2Fthebritishcitizen.com%2F2011%2F09%2F200-homes-for-immigrants%2F' data-shr_title='TWO+HUNDRED+more+homes+a+day+needed+JUST+for+immigrants'></a><a class='shareaholic-fbsend' data-shr_href='http%3A%2F%2Fthebritishcitizen.com%2F2011%2F09%2F200-homes-for-immigrants%2F'></a><a class='shareaholic-googleplusone' data-shr_size='medium' data-shr_count='true' data-shr_href='http%3A%2F%2Fthebritishcitizen.com%2F2011%2F09%2F200-homes-for-immigrants%2F' data-shr_title='TWO+HUNDRED+more+homes+a+day+needed+JUST+for+immigrants'></a></div><div style="clear: both; min-height: 1px; height: 3px; width: 100%;"></div><!-- End Shareaholic LikeButtonSetBottom Automatic -->]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://thebritishcitizen.com/2011/09/200-homes-for-immigrants/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Served from: thebritishcitizen.com @ 2012-05-22 14:35:08 -->
